Skip to main content

Worker Concept

All tests run in worker processes. These processes are OS processes, running independently, orchestrated by the test runner. All workers have identical environments and each starts its own browser.

You can't communicate between the workers. Playwright Test reuses a single worker as much as it can to make testing faster, so multiple test files are usually run in a single worker one after another.

Workers are always shutdown after a test failure to guarantee pristine environment for following tests.

 Note that parallel tests are executed in separate worker processes and cannot share any state or global variables. Each test executes all relevant hooks just for itself, including beforeAll and afterAll.

In Playwright, the concept of workers refers to dedicated contexts for executing JavaScript code in isolation from the main browser context. Workers are commonly used for scenarios where you need to run scripts concurrently or offload heavy computations without blocking the main thread. Here’s a detailed explanation of workers in Playwright:

What are Workers?

  1. Isolated Execution: Workers in Playwright are similar to web workers in browsers. They provide a way to run JavaScript code in background threads, separate from the main execution context. This isolation helps in keeping the main thread responsive and efficient.

  2. Use Cases:

    • Concurrent Tasks: Execute multiple scripts simultaneously without blocking the UI or other operations.
    • Heavy Computations: Offload intensive calculations or operations to workers to maintain responsiveness.
    • Parallel Processing: Utilize multiple CPU cores for improved performance in tasks like data processing, image manipulation, etc.
  3. Types of Workers in Playwright:

    • Dedicated Worker: Runs in its own isolated environment, separate from the main browser context. Useful for long-running tasks or complex computations.
    • Shared Worker (available in browsers but not directly in Playwright): Shared between multiple browser contexts or tabs, allowing for communication and shared state across them.

Example Usage

Here’s how you can use a dedicated worker in Playwright:

javascript
const { chromium } = require('playwright'); (async () => { const browser = await chromium.launch(); const context = await browser.newContext(); const page = await context.newPage(); // Create a dedicated worker const worker = await page.addWorker({ url: 'worker.js' // Path to the worker script }); // Communicate with the worker await worker.evaluate(() => { // Code to execute in the worker context console.log('Worker started!'); }); // Close the browser context await context.close(); // Close the browser instance await browser.close(); })();

Key Points

  • Isolation: Workers operate in their own isolated environment, separate from the main browser context. They cannot directly access the DOM or interact with the main page.
  • Communication: You can communicate with workers via message passing (postMessage and onmessage), allowing data exchange between the main thread and workers.
  • Performance: Workers leverage multi-threading capabilities, making them suitable for parallel execution and improving overall performance in computationally intensive tasks.

Considerations

  • Security: Workers adhere to the same origin policy, limiting their ability to access resources from different origins unless explicitly allowed.
  • Debugging: Debugging workers can be challenging compared to main thread scripts, requiring tools and techniques specific to worker environments.

By utilizing workers in Playwright, you can enhance the efficiency and responsiveness of your web automation scripts, especially in scenarios involving complex computations or concurrent tasks that benefit from parallel execution.

const { chromium } = require('playwright'); // Jest syntax for hooks beforeAll(async () => { // Setup before all tests global.browser = await chromium.launch(); }); afterAll(async () => { // Teardown after all tests await global.browser.close(); }); test('Example Playwright test', async () => { const page = await global.browser.newPage(); await page.goto('https://example.com'); // Perform test actions await page.click('button'); await page.waitForSelector('.result'); // Assert expected outcomes expect(await page.isVisible('.result')).toBe(true); // Close the page await page.close(); });

Key Points

  • Execution Context: Hooks like beforeAll and afterAll run in the same worker context as the tests. They are useful for managing shared resources or setup that needs to happen once per test suite or file.
  • Scope: Variables defined within these hooks (beforeAll, afterAll) can often be accessed across multiple test cases, making them suitable for scenarios where initialization and cleanup are required.

Benefits

  • Efficiency: Setting up and tearing down resources once per worker (instead of per test) can improve test execution speed and efficiency.
  • Consistency: Ensures that all tests start from a known state and that cleanup is performed reliably after tests complete, enhancing the reliability of test runs.

Considerations

  • Resource Management: Be mindful of resource utilization, especially when tests involve heavy operations like launching browsers or handling large datasets.
  • Parallel Execution: When running tests in parallel across multiple workers, each worker will independently execute its beforeAll and afterAll hooks, maintaining isolation between workers.

By leveraging hooks like test.beforeAll and test.afterAll effectively in Playwright (or any test framework), you can streamline setup and teardown processes, leading to more robust and maintainable automated test suites.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Get OTP from email

/** * Retrieves an OTP from Gmail in a headless tab. * @param {Object} options - The options for the function. * @param {string} options.email - The Gmail email address. * @param {string} options.password - The Gmail password. * @returns {Promise<string | null>} The OTP retrieved from the email. */ export async function getOtpFromGmail ({ email , password , } : { email : string ; password : string ; }) : Promise < string | null > { const { chromium } = require ( "playwright" ); // Launch a headless browser context for Gmail login const browser = await chromium . launch ({ headless : true }); const context = await browser . newContext (); const page = await context . newPage (); await page . goto ( "https://mail.google.com" ); const emailInput = await page . waitForSelector ( "#identifierId" ); await emailInput . fill ( email ); const emailNextButton = await page . wa...

Playwright Solution

 There is a web site need to run with browser. and which has zero downtime and alert and notifications pop up too. Third party applications are involved in and need to fix bugs too.What is the solution and how to create a framework for this scenario : need to use playwright as well 1. Understand the Requirements and Challenges: Zero Downtime: Ensure tests do not interrupt the service. Alerts and Notifications: Handle unexpected pop-ups gracefully. Third-Party Integrations: Test interactions with third-party services. Bug Fixing: Implement a process to identify and log bugs efficiently. 2. Set Up the Playwright Framework: Installation: Ensure Playwright is installed and configured. bash Copy code npm install playwright 3. Structure the Test Framework: Test Suites: Organize tests into suites (e.g., smoke tests, regression tests, integration tests). Page Object Model (POM): Use POM to manage page elements and actions. Configuration: Set up configurations for different envir...

Challenges

 One of the challenging situations I faced was identifying the correct locators for elements in our Angular application. Despite using developer tools like Chrome DevTools, it was often difficult to pinpoint the exact locators due to the complexity of the application and the dynamic nature of Angular's rendering. To overcome this, I frequently had to review the application's code in Bitbucket to understand the structure and find reliable locators. This approach allowed me to write more robust and reliable tests. Additionally, I communicated with developers to gain insights and confirm my findings, which helped streamline the process." As our application grew, the number of test scripts also increased, making the scripts larger and more chaotic. This was especially true for our end-to-end tests using Playwright and TypeScript. The test scripts became hard to manage and maintain because they contained both the test logic and the test data, leading to a lot of redundancy and ...