Skip to main content

Selenium vs Playwright

 Selenium and Playwright are both popular tools for automating web browser interactions, but they have distinct features and capabilities. Here’s a comparison between Selenium and Playwright across several key aspects:

1. Browser Support

  • Selenium: Supports a wide range of browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and others. Each browser requires its own driver (e.g., ChromeDriver for Chrome).
  • Playwright: Initially developed by Microsoft, Playwright supports Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit (Safari). It provides consistent API across all browsers without needing separate drivers.

2. Language Support

  • Selenium: Supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, JavaScript (Node.js), C#, Ruby, and others through Selenium WebDriver bindings.
  • Playwright: Provides native support for JavaScript (Node.js), TypeScript, Python, and C#. It offers a clean and modern API for each language.

3. API and Features

  • Selenium: Provides a mature and widely adopted API (WebDriver) for automating browser interactions. It has been the standard for web automation for many years.
  • Playwright: Offers a more modern and powerful API with built-in support for many advanced features such as:
    • Intercepting network requests
    • Emulating mobile devices
    • Recording videos of test runs
    • Taking screenshots with device emulation

4. Execution Speed

  • Selenium: Historically criticized for slower execution due to reliance on browser-specific drivers and older WebDriver protocols.
  • Playwright: Designed for speed and parallelism, utilizing a single driver for multiple browsers, and providing faster execution times in many scenarios.

5. Community and Ecosystem

  • Selenium: Has a large community and extensive ecosystem with many third-party libraries, frameworks (like TestNG, JUnit), and tools supporting it.
  • Playwright: Growing rapidly with strong support from Microsoft and the developer community. It integrates well with modern testing frameworks (like Jest, Mocha) and CI/CD pipelines.

6. Maintenance and Updates

  • Selenium: Requires frequent updates and maintenance due to changes in browser versions and driver compatibility issues.
  • Playwright: Regularly updated by Microsoft and contributors to keep pace with browser updates and new features, providing more reliable and stable automation.

7. Testing Scenarios

  • Selenium: Well-suited for traditional web testing, including basic interactions, form submissions, and UI validations.
  • Playwright: Excels in complex scenarios such as testing modern web applications, interacting with APIs, handling file uploads, and simulating various device and network conditions.

Conclusion

  • Choosing Between Selenium and Playwright:
    • Selenium: If you need broad browser support and mature ecosystem with support for multiple languages.
    • Playwright: If you prioritize speed, modern features, and consistent API across browsers.

Both Selenium and Playwright have their strengths depending on the specific requirements of your web automation projects. Evaluating factors like browser support, language preferences, features, and community support will help in making the right choice for your team and projects.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Get OTP from email

/** * Retrieves an OTP from Gmail in a headless tab. * @param {Object} options - The options for the function. * @param {string} options.email - The Gmail email address. * @param {string} options.password - The Gmail password. * @returns {Promise<string | null>} The OTP retrieved from the email. */ export async function getOtpFromGmail ({ email , password , } : { email : string ; password : string ; }) : Promise < string | null > { const { chromium } = require ( "playwright" ); // Launch a headless browser context for Gmail login const browser = await chromium . launch ({ headless : true }); const context = await browser . newContext (); const page = await context . newPage (); await page . goto ( "https://mail.google.com" ); const emailInput = await page . waitForSelector ( "#identifierId" ); await emailInput . fill ( email ); const emailNextButton = await page . wa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Playwright Solution

 There is a web site need to run with browser. and which has zero downtime and alert and notifications pop up too. Third party applications are involved in and need to fix bugs too.What is the solution and how to create a framework for this scenario : need to use playwright as well 1. Understand the Requirements and Challenges: Zero Downtime: Ensure tests do not interrupt the service. Alerts and Notifications: Handle unexpected pop-ups gracefully. Third-Party Integrations: Test interactions with third-party services. Bug Fixing: Implement a process to identify and log bugs efficiently. 2. Set Up the Playwright Framework: Installation: Ensure Playwright is installed and configured. bash Copy code npm install playwright 3. Structure the Test Framework: Test Suites: Organize tests into suites (e.g., smoke tests, regression tests, integration tests). Page Object Model (POM): Use POM to manage page elements and actions. Configuration: Set up configurations for different envir...
Post a Comment
Read more

Challenges

 One of the challenging situations I faced was identifying the correct locators for elements in our Angular application. Despite using developer tools like Chrome DevTools, it was often difficult to pinpoint the exact locators due to the complexity of the application and the dynamic nature of Angular's rendering. To overcome this, I frequently had to review the application's code in Bitbucket to understand the structure and find reliable locators. This approach allowed me to write more robust and reliable tests. Additionally, I communicated with developers to gain insights and confirm my findings, which helped streamline the process." As our application grew, the number of test scripts also increased, making the scripts larger and more chaotic. This was especially true for our end-to-end tests using Playwright and TypeScript. The test scripts became hard to manage and maintain because they contained both the test logic and the test data, leading to a lot of redundancy and ...
Post a Comment
Read more